HANDLING PEOPLE AND ORGANISATIONS
At the moment Barbour Brown can be described as a set organisational framework which means that the organizational structure has few levels of management. We can see this as it is a small company with simply two managers which is David and Neil. Like any sort of structure they have advantages plus the advantages of a flat structure is the structure permits better connection between companies and staff, also simpler decision making and reduced costs to the organization because they cannot have many managers who have larger pay than employees likewise the workers is often more involved in making decisions than becoming closely closely watched by management. There are also cons to a toned structure which can be there is not very much room intended for promotion, it truly is mo9re frustrating to build this structure than the usual traditional while this composition generally depends upon personal associations between staff and managers. The level structure is easily identifiable within the Barbour organization as current work partitions are only on three levels the initial being Detrimental, the second staying Structural as well as the third staying Administration. A flat structure is shown beneath:
We can see that David would be seen as working a centralised line when he supervises his workers by causing them indication time sheets which will allow him to check up on his staff although Neil can be seen using a de-centralised team strategy which allows him to assign work to his subordinates. In my opinion a structure that might be more relevant to the firm would be a matrix structure that may allow scope for more time to be spent with the consumer. Below can be described as diagram which in turn identifies the Matrix structure. draw:a
In a firm like Barbour Brown there will be groups or perhaps teams of workers assigned to a particular project, as an example Neil can overview the marketing...